Scope – Performance Efficiency
What is in scope?
The Performance Efficiency pillar of WAF++ addresses all technical and procedural dimensions that directly influence the performance of cloud workloads.
Compute & Scaling
-
Selection and validation of instance types and sizes
-
Auto-scaling configuration and testing for stateless workloads
-
Serverless architectures and managed services for variable load
-
Container resources (CPU/memory limits, requests in Kubernetes)
Databases & Persistence
-
Database performance baseline and slow query analysis
-
Index strategy for high-frequency read and write operations
-
Connection pool configuration and connection pool sizing
-
Storage I/O performance (disk type, IOPS, throughput)
Network & Delivery
-
CDN configuration for static and cacheable content
-
VPC endpoints and private endpoints for internal service communication
-
Network topology design and AZ affinity for latency-sensitive paths
-
DNS latency and connection reuse strategies
What is not in scope?
| Outside Scope | Why |
|---|---|
Algorithm optimizations in code |
Code-level performance is software development; WAF++ addresses infrastructure and architecture performance. |
Full fault tolerance & recovery |
RTO/RPO, backups, failover mechanisms → Reliability pillar. |
Provider contract negotiations |
Enterprise agreements and pricing negotiations → Procurement/Cost pillar. |
Security design decisions |
TLS configuration, authentication latency as a security requirement → Security pillar. |
End-user device performance |
Browser rendering, app performance on end devices is outside cloud infrastructure. |
Brownfield vs. Greenfield
Performance optimization in existing and new systems requires fundamentally different approaches.
Brownfield (existing systems)
| Dimension | Challenge | Recommended approach |
|---|---|---|
Compute Sizing |
Instance types were never selected based on metrics; utilization data is absent. |
Baseline period 2–4 weeks; then rightsizing analysis. |
Auto-Scaling |
Static capacity; scaling was never needed or never implemented. |
Incrementally: first a monitoring phase, then ASG without aggressive scaling thresholds. |
Database |
Performance Insights never enabled; slow query backlog unknown. |
Enable Insights → slow query analysis → optimize top-20 queries. |
Caching |
No cache or ad-hoc cache without a strategy. |
Access pattern analysis → introduce cache layer → measure hit rate. |
Debt Register |
Many known performance problems, but nowhere documented. |
Kickoff workshop: capture known problems → create register → prioritize. |
Greenfield (new systems)
| Dimension | Opportunity | Recommended approach |
|---|---|---|
Compute Sizing |
Sizing decisions can be planned data-driven from the start. |
Benchmark profile of the application → conservative sizing → adjust after 2 weeks. |
Auto-Scaling |
Auto-scaling can be planned from the beginning and validated immediately. |
Stateless architecture first; validate auto-scaling in the load test phase. |
SLOs |
SLOs can be defined before the first deployment. |
SLOs as part of the definition of done; instrument monitoring before go-live. |
Load Tests |
CI/CD integration can be set up from day 1. |
Write load test scripts in the first sprint; set acceptance criteria before first users. |
Performance Driver Overview
| Driver | Typical Symptom | Root Cause | WAF-PERF Control |
|---|---|---|---|
Compute Bottleneck |
High CPU/memory utilization, elevated P99 latency |
Instance too small or wrong generation |
WAF-PERF-010 |
Missing Elasticity |
Service responds slowly during load spikes |
No or incorrectly configured auto-scaling |
WAF-PERF-020 |
Cache Miss Flood |
High database utilization, high API latency |
No cache or low hit rate |
WAF-PERF-030 |
Slow Queries |
Database CPU spike, connection pool exhausted |
Missing indexes, full table scans |
WAF-PERF-040 |
Unknown P99 Latency |
SLA violations go unnoticed |
No SLO monitoring, only average values |
WAF-PERF-050 |
Performance Regression |
New version worse than previous |
No automated load test in CI/CD |
WAF-PERF-060 |
High Network Latency |
Unexpected latencies in microservice calls |
Cross-AZ traffic, no CDN, no VPC endpoint |
WAF-PERF-070 |
Cold Start Latency |
First requests after idle are slow |
Lambda/function without warmup configuration |
WAF-PERF-080 |
Storage I/O Saturation |
Database latency spikes despite normal CPU |
gp2 burst depletion, wrong disk type |
WAF-PERF-090 |
Known Problems Ignored |
Same performance incidents repeat |
No performance debt register |
WAF-PERF-100 |